Chairman of the Subcommittee, Foreign Minister Prof G L Peiris said there was no draft legislation as yet to share but only a set of proposals which they wished to discuss with civil society and other groups. He stated that there would be no repeal of PTA as there is a continuing need for it due to security issues. He explained there was a need for balance between personal liberty and freedom and the need for national security.
The noteworthy amendments described in the verbal presentation made by Prof Peiris consisted of the following:
- Detention orders: The period of validity of a detention order would be reduced from 18 months to 12 months
- Restricted use of PTA: The IGP has issued clear instructions to police officers not to have recourse to the PTA as a regular mode of arrest or as a short cut. The norm should be to investigate with the use of the normal law. They should only use PTA in exceptional circumstances when adequate evidence is found in investigation and if national security issues arise in the process of investigations
- Supervision by magistrates: It will be mandatory for magistrates to visit the place of detention and to personally ensure the welfare of detained persons. The Human Rights Commission should/ will be informed of such detention. Magistrates will be empowered to direct the IGP to investigate if any evidence of torture is found. In such a situation the Attorney General will institute criminal proceedings
- Judicial oversight: The person detained will have access to judicial appeal through Article 126 of the constitution (Fundamental Rights jurisdiction of Supreme Court) and Article 140 (Writ jurisdiction of Appeal Court). This will be spelled out in the law so that there is no ambiguity. This will be the first time in the four decade long history of PTA that detention orders can be legally challenged
- Access to lawyer: The person detained will have the right to access a lawyer and to visits by family members. This will be a statutory right so that there is no discretion in the matter
- Repeal of Section 14 of PTA: This prohibits publication of any statement made by the detainee or with regard to the investigation
- Speedy trial: Trials of PTA cases will take place on a daily basis until completed to avoid delays. The Chief Justice has already directed that PTA cases should be expedited
- Advisory Board: This has been set up under Section 13 of the PTA. Chaired by retired Chief Justice Asoka de Silva it has already recommended the release of 26, 8 and 6 prisoners on three occasions. The Advisory Board is expected to make recommendations and advise the President on the investigation, release, granting of bail and future action related to the persons imprisoned over terrorist activities and detained under detention orders
Prof Peiris explained that the changes to PTA proposed were a result of consensus between the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Justice and Defence and the Attorney General’s Department; these changes are not conceived as one-off ones, but as a part of a continuum, there being other changes contemplated that will be agreed on later. He also assured that changes in legislation will be rapid, and take place early next year.
No written documents were provided to the SLCC either before or during the meeting. However, SLCC presented a position paper of our own to the ministerial subcommittee which provides the principles underlying and restraining the PTA which we wish to have incorporated into the amended PTA (see attached).
On our part, among others, we highlighted the following:
- Arbitrary arrests need to be ended. An example was given from Batticaloa where 10 civilians including a mother of two had been taken under PTA for commemoration of their dead relatives.
- The period prior to indictment should be considered under the normal law, and hence the judicial officers had power to bail out detainees, as decided in the Pathmanathan case by the Supreme Court and magistrates to be apprised accordingly
- When detainees are sent to other districts on remand there is lack of communication and cross checking which can be rectified by video links for communication
- All actions with regard to detention need to be judicial rather than executive or administrative
We were mindful that as we were being briefed by the Ministerial subcommittee on November 27, family members and others who sought to commemorate Martyrs Day of fallen LTTE cadres were being forcibly prevented by the security forces and arrests and assaults took place. SLCC therefore stresses the importance of national reconciliation taking place in a larger environment that is respectful of human rights.
SLCC expressed appreciation of the subcommittee’s initiative to engage with a group of CSOs at this briefing session. We said we looked forward to further discussions once the government legislation had emerged in a draft form. We also requested the subcommittee to engage with other CSOs which had evinced much keenness to do so. Chairman of the subcommittee Prof G L Peiris invited interested CSOs to make written submissions without delay to the subcommittee for consideration.
Sri Lanka Collective for Consensus (SLCC)
Ven. Kalupahana Piyaratana Prof. T. Jayasingam
Rev. Asiri Perera (Retired President/ Bishop) Prof. Tudor Silva
Rev. Fr. C.G. Jeyakumar Mr. Hilmy Ahamed
Mr. Rohana Hettiarachchi Mr. V. Kamaladhas
Dr. Joe William Mr.S. Wimalagunarathna
Dr. Dayani Panagoda Ms. Visaka Dharmadasa
Dr. Jehan Perera Mr. Javid Yusuf
Ms. Sarah Arumugam
The Sri Lankan Collective for Consensus is a group of individuals drawn from multiple sectors of society, religion, academia, and non-governmental organisations. They are committed to a Sri Lanka that is founded on ideals of pluralistic coexistence, human rights, and justice.